lecba-akne.info: The Grapes Of Wrath lecba-akne.info: ptiff lecba-akne.info: pdf DOWNLOAD OPTIONS. download 1 file eBooks and Texts. Uploaded by Public. Free kindle book and epub digitized and proofread by Project Gutenberg. Grapes of wrath by Boyd Cable Download This eBook. Read "The Grapes of Wrath" by John Steinbeck available from Rakuten Kobo. Sign up today and get $5 off your first purchase. The Pulitzer Prize-winning epic of.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Portuguese|
|Country:||United Arab Emirates|
|ePub File Size:||15.71 MB|
|PDF File Size:||13.72 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Download 20 Popular High School Books Available as Free eBooks & Audio The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck - Free Audio Book from. Editorial Reviews. lecba-akne.info Review. When The Grapes of Wrath was published in , Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. $ eBook features: Read with the free Kindle apps ( available on iOS, Android, PC & Mac), Kindle E-readers and on Fire Tablet devices. See all. LGHS library's e-books available to read online or download - access through the online catalog: The Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck Project Gutenberg offers over 40, free ebooks: choose among free epub books, free kindle books.
Shocking and controversial when it was first published in , Steinbeck's Pulitzer Prize-winning epic remains his undisputed masterpiece. Set against the background of dust bowl Oklahoma and Californian migrant life, it tells of the Joad family, who, like thousands of others, are forced to travel West in search of the promised land. Their story is one of false hopes, thwarted desires and broken dreams, yet out of their suffering Steinbeck created a drama that is intensely human yet majestic in its scale and moral vision; an eloquent tribute to the endurance and dignity of the human spirit. The prize must have come, at least in part, because alongside the poverty and dispossession, Steinbeck chronicled the Joads' refusal, even inability, to let go of their faltering but unmistakable hold on human dignity. Witnessing their degeneration from Oklahoma farmers to a diminished band of migrant workers is nothing short of crushing. The Joads lose family members to death and cowardice as they go, and are challenged by everything from weather to the authorities to the California locals themselves.
In the end, I discovered his characters in the faces I saw on the road, I smelled his descriptions of nature in the humid or dry, dusty air, I heard his dialogues in the everyday exchanges on markets and in hot small town streets. I love them all, each one in my carefully kept Steinbeck collection. Asked by one of my children the other day which Steinbeck had influenced me most, I thought I was going to give an evasive, diplomatic answer, not making a statement for or against any specific story.
Instead I heard myself say: It may not exactly be my favourite Steinbeck, but definitely the one I feel uncomfortably, chillingly getting under my skin immediately. Just recalling the voices of the characters makes me shiver - as they suffer through the ordeal of fleeing from the Dust Bowl, that environmental catastrophe caused by greed and paid for by individual families, to a Californian paradise which doesn't welcome newcomers.
The poverty, the suffering, the love and despair - it is tangible in each sentence, in each story line! Family saga, social study, historical document, political standpoint, ethical statement on compassion and greed - it is all there, but invisible under the masterfully crafted story, which has its own quality, beyond the message on the essential needs and worries of poor, common people without protective networks. I don't know how to close this review, as I am not done with this novel at all, despite having read it several times.
But one quote shall stand as a warning to those who believe their wealth protects them against being humans, and feeling poor for behaving poorly: View all 24 comments. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage. This book really gets my goat. Those poor, dirty Joads.
Follow the Author
So poor and so, so dirty. After being displaced from their Oklahoma farm following the Dust Bowl storms that wreck their crops and cause them to default on their loans, the Joads find themselves a family of migrants in search of work and food. They join a stream of hundreds of thousands of other migrant families across the United Stat In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage. They join a stream of hundreds of thousands of other migrant families across the United States to what they believe to be the prosperous valleys of California.
Only once they arrive, they discover that there is nothing prosperous about it—not only is there a serious shortage of work mostly caused by an overabundance of labor that came with the influx of so many other migrant families , but they also have to contend with growing anti-migrant sentiment among the local population and wealthy landowners who think nothing of taking advantage of them in their state of vulnerability.
Yes, it is the Great Depression and this is not an easy time to find a job even for skilled workers. And yes, they are a family of 47 and they probably look pretty ridiculous all crammed up in the back of their makeshift pickup truck. But gosh darn it, if only they had unions! If only they had fair labor standards to guarantee them a minimum wage! If only they had the protection of government legislation to prohibit wealthy landowners from colluding to keep prices high and wages low!
Which leads me to wonder… what would Ayn Rand think of all this? What is it Ma Joad says? View all 36 comments. Most of the 4 and 5 star ratings came from those who read it as adults. I recommend listening to those who read it as adults.
Many people hate the ending, but I thought it was great. Yes, but there was an immense amount of beauty and generosity in that creepy little ending. At one point in the story, Ma tol' Rosasharn that it ain't all about her most high school kids think everything is all about them, which is probably one reason they couldn't enjoy this book or most other classics they are forced to read.
Realizing this at the very end made Rosasharn crack her first smile in ages at least that's my take on the mysterious smile. I wasn't disappointed in the lack of closure at the end, because the closure came in the middle when Ma said, "Rich fellas come up an' they die, an' their kids ain't no good an' they die out. But we keep a'comin'. We're the people that live. They can't wipe us out; they can't lick us.
We'll go on forever, Pa, 'cause we're the people. They will be better off than the rich man with the million acres they talked about - "If he needs a million acres to make him feel rich, seems to me he needs it 'cause he feels awful poor inside hisself, and if he's poor in hisself, there ain't no million acres gonna make him feel rich, an' maybe he's disappointed that nothin' he can do'll make him feel rich.
If you're in trouble or hurt or need - go to the poor people. They're the only ones that'll help - the only ones. Would anyone like my savings account?
I think I'm going to give poverty a shot: During the bleakness of the dry, dust bowl days , as the suffocating particles fall everywhere Seeing black and w During the bleakness of the dry, dust bowl days , as the suffocating particles fall everywhere Seeing black and white pictures tell only a small portion of this, the real story that John Steinbeck wrote about masterfully in his novel , The Grapes of Wrath.
Where a hungry, large group of people, travel to the promise land of California a distant , 1, miles away but find more starvation, abuse and death. In an old dilapidated automobile the Joad's , Ma, the de facto leader, and Pa, Tom, just released from prison for killing a man in self defense, it didn't help that both were drunk.
Rose, a teenager married to a lazy, shiftless dreamer, Connie and pregnant, Uncle John who likes the bottle and his late wife, he mourns too much for, their ancient parents and four other children.
And last but not least, the preacher Reverend Jim Casy, who doesn't want to preach no more, having lost his faith the thirteenth member some will not get to their goal.
Grapes of wrath by Boyd Cable - Free Ebook
He's now, after walking around searching for a purpose, in fact living like a bum, decides since the people have left for the Golden State , why not him too? Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and at long last crossing the Colorado River, into the paradise of California, with high mountains and hot steaming deserts, discovering more desert wastelands and still hundreds of miles to the fertile, prosperous , pretty, fabulously wealthy valley , of San Joaquin, the richest one on the planet.
But not for the , Okies , a misnomer, since many are not from Oklahoma an unknown name to the newcomers, as they're scornfully called here, unfriendly natives and police hate , greatly distrust these poor, needy miserable folks and frightened of them, most assuredly. The affluent farmers keep cutting the wages, 30 cents an hour, 25, 20 and dropping, how can the workers survive? Tom is angry, tired of the endless struggle going from place to place in search of work, lack of food, housing, especially the treatment by the well off Nevertheless believes that nobody is above him and will fight back, if necessary.
Deadly strikes, deputies burning down the laborers camps, violence and starving the old and the young, the vulnerable will not endure. A strong statement about man's inhumanity to his fellow being A little kindness sought but will it be found? Me ha encantado. Una tierra de la que supuestamente mana leche y miel.
Pero la familia Joad, igual de Me ha encantado. Aunque quiero dejarlo claro, esta novela no es un "panfleto comunista" como la tildaron muchos en su momento. Es un libro que habla sobre los derechos fundamentales de los seres humanos: La familia Joad solo busca trabajo y vivir en una casita humilde.
Los mantiene unidos, sabe que solo se tienen a ellos mismos y aguanta cualquier cosa sin derrumbarse. El final se cierra con broche de oro mediante un gesto que mezcla miseria y esperanza.
View all 28 comments. How can you frighten a man whose hunger is not only in his own cramped stomach but in the wretched bellies of his children? Published in , it is arguably Steinbeck's best known work and is still widely read today. Admirers praised Steinbeck for writing an epic tale of Biblical proportions, singing songs of th How can you frighten a man whose hunger is not only in his own cramped stomach but in the wretched bellies of his children?
Admirers praised Steinbeck for writing an epic tale of Biblical proportions, singing songs of the common men and women and their struggle against exploitation by the rich and powerful, the strength of a family and the endurance human spirit in the Great Depression and the tragedy of the Dust Bowl, which forced many families to abandon land which was their livelihood for generations. Detractors accuse Steinbeck of being sentimental and one-sided, of greatly exaggerating the effect that the period and the surrounding had on the people he describes, of being a socialist, a Marxist, a communist and a propagandist sometimes not all at once.
Associated Farmers of California called the book "a pack of lies" and "communist propaganda", while Burton Rascoe writing for Newsweek added that The Grapes of Wrath was nothing more than superficial observation, careless infidelity to the proper use of idiom, tasteless pornographical and scatagorical talk. Criticism didn't stop at negative reviews. The book was banned across the country and sometimes publicly burned by enraged citizens; Steinbeck received hate mail and death threats.
The book made him a lot of powerful enemies. A whispering smear campaign against Steinbeck was set in motion by his new enemies, aiming to defame him and turn him from a celebrated author into a figure of hatred: The Associated Farmers are really working up a campaign , he wrote to his agent, I have made powerful enemies with the Grapes.
They will not kill me, I think, but they will destroy me if and when they can. He was right. When Lewis Milestone, author of the screenplay for Mice and Men came to central California to explore possible locations for the movie, Steinbeck never stopped at any ranches in fear that they might get physically assaulted by their residents. The undersheriff of Santa Clara County was a friend of Steinbeck, and warned him to never stay in a hotel room alone: You get alone in a hotel and a dame will come in, tear off her clothes, scratch her face and scream and you try to talk yourself out of that one.
Steinbeck found himself under enormous stress and strain as he realized that Associated Farmers controlled the sheriff's office in California, and were "capable of anything"; he was also investigated by the FBI under president Hoover, which saw him as a dangerous subversive.
He had to adopt an alias while visiting Los Angeles and keep secret files. John Steinbeck in , when the book was published. Still, at the same time, many other readers found The Grapes of Wrath to be enthralling and necessary - a book which attracted attention to the plight of poor migrant farm workers to the West, showed the brutality and harshness of their condition and challenged the nation to do better for those people. Earle Birney called the book a deed - the act of a man out of the pity and wrath of his heart , and it was read and loved as such.
It captured the turbulent period of American history and provoked a reaction. It made an impact, a real and lasting one - which is its greatest achievement. Interestingly enough, within months of its publication journalist Carey McWilliams published his own work on treatment of migrant workers in California.
Factories in the Field: The Story of Migratory Farm Labor in California was a landmark study which exposed the social and environmental damage inflicted by the growth of corporate agriculture in California, and a condemnation of both the politics and consequences of large-scale agribusiness.
McWilliams documented the social and economic trends which led to establishment of huge land holdings in California and the constant need for cheap migrant labor; he found that the "Okies" were only the latest group to be exploited by the invisible owners of California's first industry. Shortly before the publication of Factories in the Field , McWilliams became the head of California's Division of Immigration and Housing where he focused on improving wages for agricultural workers and their living conditions; he increased inspections of labor camps owned by the growers, as he felt that on-farm housing made the workers more dependent on their employers, and changed the formula which was used to deny relief to workers who refused to accept farm work at prevailing piece wages, effectively forcing some of the growers to increase their piece rates.
Understandably, McWilliams and his work were also not well received by California growers; they called him an Agricultural Pest Number One, worse than pear blight or boll weevils , and accused of conspiring together with Steinbeck to ruin their reputation.
Funnily enough the two never met, and did not arrange the release dates of their work in any way. Between and , the committee conducted extensive hearings and collected a vast number of testimonies. These hearings exposed the tactics used by America's leading corporations to prevent their workers from forming unions: The committee closed its hearings in late and early , when it traveled up and down the California coast and collected testimonies of more than four hundred labor organizers, growers and farm workers.
McWilliams ghostwrote the committee's report, a stern indictment of California's agricultural factory system, but it was not presented to Congress until October , without much impact: McWilliams felt that the War enabled both growers and state officials from implementing a reform which they would almost certainly would have been forced to implement otherwise, and that the whole country went to sleep until a young black girl named Rosa Parks refused to go to the back of the bus in Montgomery, Alabama in He, however, did not stay silent and stop working.
On the contrary, failure to implement recommended reforms seemed to give him more strength to combat injustice: Japanese Americans, Symbol of Racial Intolerance , a sharp critique and a chronicle of internment of Japanese-Americans during the War, and was active in opposing McCarthyism. His article appeared in October, five months before the invasion happened. He died in Carey McWilliams, a good man. The copy of The Grapes of Wrath that I read had a great introduction by Robert DeMott, who provided plenty of excerpts from Steinbeck's journal and revealed his ambitions and doubts as he was composing the book.
Steinbeck was convinced that if he could "do the book properly", it would be a truly American book and "one of the really fine books". At the same time, he was constantly thinking about what he perceived to be his own lack of ability and limitations as a writer, which greatly troubled him.
Honesty was what he saw as the answer and the way to write the book - if he could keep the honesty in, everything would be fine. Steibeck had plenty of opportunity to do exactly that. While his initial writings have not been successful, he struck a chord with 's Tortilla Flat which tells the story of Danny and his friends, a group of paisanos who live in post-war Monterey. The severe drought of the early 's resulted in a massive agricultural failure in the southern region of the Great Plains, above all in western Oklahoma and the Texas panhandle, where the fields have been heavily overcultivated by wheat farmers after the first World War.
The area consisted of millions of acres of exposed topsoil, no longer anchored by growing roots as the crops withered and died from lack of rainfall.
Constant sunshine dried the soil and turned it into dust, which then blew away in amounts sufficient to black out the sky and reduce visibility to a few feet; these immense dust storms centered on the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas, and the adjacent areas of Kansas, Colorado and New Mexico. By the mid 's countless families have been deprived of means to earn their livelihood, pay their mortgages and buy equipment necessary to stay competitive with growing industrialization.
Dust Bowl victims were forced to leave their lands, and without any real prospects of employment move to California - the promised land. A dust storm hitting Boise City, right in the panhandle of Oklahoma on April 14th, This storm was particularly severe, and was one of the worst dust storms in American history, causing immense economic and agricultural damage - it is estimated to have displaced million tons of topsoil in the Great Plains.
It became known as the Black Sunday. Right click - open in a new tab for a bigger photo In Steinbeck was hired by the San Francisco News , which commissioned him to write a series of articles on the Dust Bowl migration. To write the seven articles, published as The Harvest Gypsies , Steinbeck traveled to California and visited local labor camps, shantytowns and Hoovervilles - migrant settlements named so after President Herbert Hoover, who was widely blamed for the Depression.
There he met Tom Collins, manager of the Weedpatch Camp who became a major source of information and a travelling companion. Collins collected statistics on camp life which Steinbeck used as primary material for his articles, and both traveled together on three trips through California.
They visited the settlements, went to meetings, stayed on camps and ranches, worked in the fields. After the publication Steinbeck and his wife drove west along Route 66, from Oklahoma to California, like countless migrants before them.
These experiences provided Steinbeck with more than enough material to depict the lives of poor farmers forced to migrate west. He set out to write a novel, conscious of the importance of what he saw and experienced. I am not writing a satisfying story , he told his editor, Pascal Covici.
I've done my damnedest to rip a reader's nerves to rags, I don't want him satisfied I tried to write this book the way lives are being lived not the way books are written. All through the process, Steinbeck remained aware of the fact that he was creating a literary work. DeMott describes The Grapes of Wrath as an engaged novel with a partisan posture, many complex voices, and passionate prose styles. Steinbeck saw the composition process of the novel similar to the composition of a symphony - he wanted his chapters, voices and styles speak to each other, resonate with recurring themes, the total impression far more powerful than its individual parts.
Steinbeck wrote of events and people he himself experienced and knew, and his concern was humanitarian: Men willing to work were hungry and starved in the land of plenty, which for Steinbeck and any moral human being was unacceptable; He sided with David rather than Goliath, and set out to write an epic which would surpass all of his other work.
This must be a good book , he wrote in his journal, it simply must. I haven't any choice. It must be far and away the best thing I have ever attempted - slow but sure, piling detail on detail until a picture and an experience emerge.
Until the whole throbbing thing emerges. Steinbeck was aware of his ambition and consciously employed imagery from and parallels to the single best read epic text in the US - the Bible. The exodus of the Joad family to California was written with the attention and momentum of the Biblical Exodus of the Isrealites, led by Moses out of Egypt. California is the Promised Land, a good and spacious land, a land flowing with milk and honey Exodus 3: The Okies arriving at the border of California are stopped by the border patrol guards, who refuse to let them enter except for when the labor is needed - much like the Israelites faced persecution and cruelty from the Amonites, Moabites and Edomites when they were trying to enter Caanan.
Tom Joad can be seen as Moses - he killed a man who spoke bad about Jim Casy, like Moses killed an Egyptian who was beating a Hebrew slave, and both served as leader figures for their people. Jim Casy is a Christ figure, down to the same initials - a preacher who questioned the established religion and fought the temptations of flesh, and lead the twelve Joads like Christ lead his twelve disciples.
Like Jesus, he disappeared and wandered alone; He taught the gospel of social and spiritual unity: The Joads depend on their car like Noah depended on his ark, and like Noah gathered all the necessary species to preserve life on earth they gathered all their important things to ensure their own survival. The old Testament practically jumps off the page - there's even a literal flood in this story.
It is also interesting to see from the perspective of a contemporary reader how the novel reads like a perfect example of a dystopian novel: The theme of large corporations and financial institutions effectively assuming control over lives of individual people is a classic dystopian theme, and so is the journey of a group of those who survived the collapse of society - classic example being The Stand , more recent being the Pulizer winning The Road.
Steinbeck's landscape is bleak and hostile, his protagonists experience real life-threatening risks and deprivations which forces them to cross many boundaries.
The Grapes of Wrath became the most successful social protest novel of the 20th century, and its message remains fresh and accurate even today, especially today. We live in a period characterized by growing income inequality and the widening gap between the richest and the poorest, where certain institutions of the financial sector have been deemed "too big to fail" effectively making them more dangerous than ever.
Corporations lobby the politicians to ensure that their own interests are met, and enjoy a wide range of big government subsidies and tax breaks, sponsored by ordinary citizens. While the big corporations enjoy all the benefits guaranteed by a big, nanny state ordinary citizens are being told that they don't deserve it and that they have to help themselves and pull themselves up by their own bootstraps; politicians and pundits use the words "welfare" in pejorative context when it comes to their own viewers and constituents, as if it was something shameful instead of an extended hand, which helps the ordinary working people stay afloat.
A welfare state is inconsiderable if it could actually benefit those who need it most - the poor and struggling ordinary citizens, who are left to walk on their own and slowly cross to the other side. In this vision of society all that I regard as a vice is turned into a virtue: American economist Robert Reich recently made a succinct post on his Facebook page, which I quote here in its entirety emphasis mine.
Play us out, Mr. The private sector, it was assumed, could do it better; competition and the profit motive would generate savings and efficiencies; citizens would be better served if they were treated as "customers" and "clients. What happened? The rich have seceded into their own private schools, private jets, private health clubs, and privatized communities; most Americans must now pay individually for what previous generations paid for collectively, through their taxes.
Certain public goods, like higher education, have morphed into private investments. But the biggest loss, I think, has been our sense of the common good itself: View all 75 comments. Those with grit enough to keep the faith. Oklahoma, Tractors invade the barren plains, ruining crops, demolishing houses, stripping farmers of their livelihood, leaving only billows of dust and ransacked land behind. Bewildered families choke with disbelief at the lame excuses of the landowners who blame a monster bigger than them.
Not the severe droughts, not the iron machines, not their useless greed, but the bank, the bank forced them to do it. And so a pilgrimage of thousands of destitute families to the promised land of Calif Oklahoma, And so a pilgrimage of thousands of destitute families to the promised land of California where the valleys are ripe with fresh hope and sweet grapes begins, and the roads become a limbless reptile hauling an endless tail of wrecked trucks and rootless people who have exchanged their living heritage for the expectation of honest jobs and decent lives.
Framed in bold dialogue and raw dialectical jargon, a menagerie of styles, dissonant voices, folk wisdom and biblical imagery gives shape to the mystic soul of the book, which orbits around two concentric points: When the Joads are obliged to abandon their farm they are also deprived of their dignity, of their ancestry, of their roots.
But when hope becomes desperation, desperation melts in prayer, prayer degenerates into hunger and hunger ferments in wrath and the skies break lose in floods of misfortune and a mother caresses the disfigured face of her son in the dark, the debilitated bonds that kept the family together shatter silently in fragmented impotence and paralyzing vexation, leaving only one absolute, pulsating soul that speaks for all people, the ghost of Tom Joad: View all 99 comments.
May 11, Carol rated it it was amazing Shelves: Powerful and Tragic View all 40 comments. Dec 27, Madeline rated it really liked it Shelves: This was a tough one to read. I don't just mean it was depressing. It was, obviously - a book about a poor family being forced from their home during the Great Depression and having to beg for the chance to pick cotton at fifteen cents per hour can't be anything except depressing - but it wasn't the most depressing book I've ever read.
This was hard to read, not because it was a por Chirst. This was hard to read, not because it was a portrayal of a horrible period of history that actually happened. That contributed to the tragedy of the book, of course, coupled with the knowledge that there were not just a few Joad families during the Great Depression, but millions of them, so your percentage of possible happy endings is going to be pretty low. It wasn't even sad because Steinbeck was using the backdrop of the Great Depression to illustrate the greater problems in America - the disparity between rich and poor, the way low-level laborers have to fight tooth and nail to achieve the most basic human rights, the fact that the people who run the major banks and farms are horrible unfeeling shells of human beings, etc.
The Grapes of Wrath is sad for all of these reasons, but here is what makes it sadder than anything: It's because that horrible period went away, and then it came back. We aren't in the middle of a second Dust Bowl, but make no mistake: If you haven't read yet and have always been meaning to, there's no better time than now.
Steinbeck's book was written in the late 's, but just about everything that happens here is happening right in your state - possibly in your neighborhood - as you read this. You read about the banks in the Great Depression sending men to bulldoze people's houses while the family stood outside, and find yourself thinking, "Well, at least now they just pile all your stuff on the curb after you get foreclosed on.
You read about the Joad family and the others being called "Okies" and forced out of their camps by the cops, and think about politicians who scream about "illegals" taking away the good American jobs and deporting kids' parents. Is this review getting too politcally-minded? That's how Steinbeck would have wanted me to talk about his book, because let me assure you - The Grapes of Wrath is extremely fucking political. Another reviewer called it the anti- Atlas Shrugged , which is pretty damn apt.
It's all about unions and the rights of the worker and how poor people need government assistance because sometimes life just sucks for no fucking reason.
It's sad and it's searing, and beautifully written, and unrelentingly depressing. But it should be read. Look, I know that Steinbeck didn't have to give the Joads a happy ending, and I'm not saying he gave them a sad one either - he gave them a weird one instead.
I was already pretty sick of hearing about Rose of Sharon and her magical pregnancy, so it was just the cherry on top of a shit subplot sundae that the ending view spoiler [had her breastfeeding an old man after her baby died.
I kind of get what Steinbeck was trying to say with his ending, because it kind of tied into his idea that the only ones who help poor people are other poor people, and Rose of Sharon was literally feeding a dying man with her own body and oh my god personal sacrifice And it was weird and gross and then the book was over.
View all 18 comments. This novel is amazing. The Grapes of Wrath is one of those books that for years I'd been embarrassed I hadn't read yet. I was familiar with other works by John Steinbeck, but somehow I hadn't gotten around to this classic of American literature until now. Pardon my language, but holy shit is this book good. I was blown away by the scope of the work, how it followed not just the Joad family traveling from Oklahoma to California, but it also meditated on the problems of all the displaced families o This novel is amazing.
I was blown away by the scope of the work, how it followed not just the Joad family traveling from Oklahoma to California, but it also meditated on the problems of all the displaced families of the Great Depression, and on all the poor farmers who were driven from their homes and their lands by Big Banks and Greedy Corporations. Many of those farmers ended up in California, hoping to find work and a decent living, but instead found menial wages, prejudice, hunger and disease.
It's a devastating chapter of American history. I listened to this on audio, read by the talented actor Dylan Baker, and I would highly recommend his performance.
I also recommend the film version directed by John Ford and starring Henry Fonda, which was mostly faithful to the book. In the movie, Fonda seems to be carrying the entire weight of the Depression on his shoulders.
I think what is most alarming about reading The Grapes of Wrath in the early 21st century is recognizing how relevant the themes are today, because the country is still run by big banks and greedy corporations. Karl Marx was right: The working class is oppressed, y'all.
Five stars for the impressive John Steinbeck. Five stars for the Joad family, searching for a new life. And five stars for Dylan Baker's excellent narration. Favorite Quotes "There ain't no sin and there ain't no virtue. There's just stuff people do. And since old Tom and the children could not know hurt or fear unless she acknowledged hurt or fear, she had practiced denying them in herself.
And since, when a joyful thing happened, they looked to see whether joy was on her, it was her habit to build laughter out of inadequate materials She seemed to know that if she swayed the family shook, and if she ever deeply wavered or despaired the family would fall. Sep 02, Natalie Vellacott rated it did not like it Shelves: This was a library book. I didn't get on with it at all despite trying to read it twice.
I gave up about a third of the way through in the end. It is about the life of one American family during the Great Depression. There is some beautiful creative writing in places but the story itself is so very slow. It just didn't hold my interest due to the lengthy dialogue between the characters who were talking about nothing in particular.
It was like being a fly on the wall at a really dull tea party wh This was a library book. It was like being a fly on the wall at a really dull tea party where everyone is making small talk. It seems they were allowing waves of nostalgia to sweep over them--forcing everyone to listen as one by one they recounted monotonous tales from their youth.
I guess I probably shouldn't make such comments about something labelled a classic, but for me it was not. As a Christian, I also found the language, particularly the regular blasphemy, offensive and would probably have stopped reading earlier for that reason had it not been a classic. I also didn't appreciate the early scenes where the local vicar was using his position to bed all of the young women in his parish. I don't recommend this book due to the language, the sexual content and the monotony, I'm sorry I wasted a few hours on it.
I consider that I have carried out my duty by advising you, fellow readers, not to do the same. View all 44 comments.
What is Kobo Super Points?
Paul B You are a bad person. Mar 25, David Yes, I believe superficial is the best way to describe this review. At least she tried, I guess. I love the freedom that allows art to offend and provoke thought. The same freedom allows this person to express her opinion and bring the overall rating down on Goodreads.
The Grapes of Wrath is a story about the pursuit of power by a few selected individuals and its domino effects on the society and the lives of thousands of people. Sadly, still to this day, we can see in the news that there are people working for less than the minimal wage and under slave labor conditio The Grapes of Wrath is a story about the pursuit of power by a few selected individuals and its domino effects on the society and the lives of thousands of people.
Sadly, still to this day, we can see in the news that there are people working for less than the minimal wage and under slave labor conditions. To tell us this story, John Steinbeck presents to us the life of the Joads: Slow paced and packed with long descriptions, I imagined it would take me up to three weeks to get through the book by my reading standards; it took me nine days instead.
It was impossible to not start caring about the family right away or to stop desiring that they would have a deserved happy ending where they would finally find some relief. As the pages turned though, I realized that the Joads represented the lives of thousands and that their fates would likely be consistent to the sore reality of what happened to the majority of the migrants on the same road as them.
In order to help us to realize the bigger picture that he wanted to portray, Steinbeck used smaller chapters, that felt almost like interludes, showing us the similar situation that unidentified people were enduring.
A big highlight for me was that the author succeeded in making his characters realistic, and it was plain to see that their behaviors were in line with their personalities in every one of their actions i. Having known and been around tenant farmers myself, it was clear to me how Steinbeck really captured their persona, temper and features while conceiving these characters. Before completing The Grapes of Wrath , he wrote some reports on the subject and was working on an unfinished novel called The Oklahomans.
One of the striking traces I recognized in the Joads - and mainly everyone they met in their journey, but best represented in the book by the Wilson and the Wainwright families - was that they were truly willing to share whatever they had even under those trying times. This compassionate way of thinking and their mentality of doing good in order to receive good things ironically turned out to be working against them in more than one occasion.
Their simplistic logic blindsided them into not realizing there were bigger interests in the game. For film buffs: Although there are some changes, it stays somewhat faithful to the story and the acting is on point all around, with Jane Darwell Ma Joad deservingly winning an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress.
The major difference from the novel is that the film adaptation switched some events and it ends in a high note, leaving us hopeful and optimistic, under the impression that everything will turn out well. View all 31 comments. Jun 14, Helene Jeppesen rated it it was amazing. This book was incredibly scary; especially because it was so realistic. John Steinbeck has a way of depicting society and people in a raw and honest way that leaves you with a hollow feeling inside, and yet you devour his books because they are so amazing.
In "The Grapes of Wrath" we meet Tom, who has just been released from prison on probation, as well as his family who's about to move to the West because banks and tractors have evicted them from their own home and land.
It's USA in the middle This book was incredibly scary; especially because it was so realistic. Everyone is moving from East to West in order to find work and survive these new and abhorrent circumstances.
In many ways, the writing of this book is very straight-forward, but at the same time it digs deeper when you read between the lines and look behind the characters' behaviour and dialogue. I was especially fond of how Steinbeck, at every other chapter, stops up to depict the conditions in America at that point in time; whether it be about a car seller and his greediness, the devastating conditions for the workers in the fruit fields or a turtle.
I was a big fan, and especially the ending left me speechless. View all 4 comments. There has been an upward trend in cases of farmer suicides in Maharashtra, Telangana, Karnataka and Punjab recently, besides reporting of instances in Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, says an Intelligence Bureau note submitted to the Modi government late last week.
The December 19 report, marked to national security adviser Ajit Kumar Doval, principal secretary to the Prime Minister Nripendra Mishra, and agriculture ministry, among others, has blamed rising farmer suicides on erratic monsoon at the onset stage this year, outstanding loans, rising debt, low crop yield, poor procurement rate of crops and successive crop failure.
It also linked the agriculturists' woes to a depleted water table, unsuitable macro-economic policies with respect to taxes, non-farm loans and faulty prices of import and export. Campaigners say a contributing factor may be the high price of genetically modified seeds flooding the market, which is piling pressure on poorly paid growers, forcing many into a cycle of unmanageable debt. The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck is such a book.
I read it during a period of recuperation after a severe bout of viral flu during my late teens. I never knew who Steinbeck was before I read this book, and I had only a sketchy idea of what the Great Depression was. Meanwhile, educators don't miss our collection of Free Courses. It features many free Literature courses, including courses on American literature. We're hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture's continued operation, please consider making a donation.
We thank you! Getting a classic book as an audiobook is the best way for busy people to get in the reading they want.
Getting a classic book as an eBook is the best way for busy people to get in the reading they want. Wow…, I just love this. You have taught a planet with these trust me. Thank you, God bless. My learning easy excellent short and long memory allow me to keep reading in order to develop so much more intelectual skills so, Thanks in advance. I want to compare my book with it.. I am excited that you have free books for high school students.
Just accessing website to see what is available. Thanks for early response. Name required.
Email required. Click here to cancel reply. Get the best cultural and educational resources on the web curated for you in a daily email. We never spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. Plays by William Shakespeare No description needed. None given. We listed Audible. Comments 27 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. October 6, at 8: Dana says: April 16, at 7: June 9, at Chris says: July 8, at December 29, at 8: December 30, at 1: January 2, at 1: June 14, at 8: Rahul says: September 24, at January 7, at March 10, at March 18, at March 28, at 2: Suenoir says: April 28, at 2: Ishola T.
M says: July 15, at 9: March 20, at