Read "What the Dog Saw And Other Adventures" by Malcolm Gladwell available from Rakuten Kobo. Sign up today and get $5 off your first purchase. What is. In What the Dog Saw Malcolm Gladwell covers everything from criminology to spaghetti sauce to Kobo BooksKobo eBooksFREE - In Google Play What the Dog Saw - And Other Adventures ebook by Malcolm Gladwell .. Penguin; ISBN: ; Language: English; Download options: EPUB 2 (Adobe DRM). Editorial Reviews. From Publishers Weekly. Gladwell's fourth book comprises various Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like Support Advanced Search · Kindle Store · Kindle eBooks · Literature & Fiction . $ Read with Our Free App; Audiobook. $ Free with.
|Language:||English, Spanish, German|
|ePub File Size:||23.39 MB|
|PDF File Size:||20.49 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
downloads Views KB Size Report. DOWNLOAD EPUB Theories, Predictions, and Diagnoses: Part Two from What the Dog Saw. Read more. What the dog saw [electronic resource (EPUB eBook)]: and other adventures / Malcolm Gladwell. Online Access: Go to download page. Tags: Add Tag. Mar 22, What the Dog Saw ebook EPUB/PDF/PRC/MOBI/AZW3 free download. Author: Malcolm Gladwell.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book.
Why are there dozens of varieties of mustard-but only one variety of ketchup? What do football players teach us about how to hire teachers? What does hair dye tell us about the history of the 20th century?
In the past decade, Malcolm Gladwell has written three books that have radically changed how we understand our world and ourselves: The Tipping Point; Blink; and Outliers. Now, in What the Dog Saw , he brings together, for the first time, the best of his writing from The New Yorker over the same period. Here is the bittersweet tale of the inventor of the birth control pill, and the dazzling inventions of the pasta sauce pioneer Howard Moscowitz.
A Little, Brown hardcover.
All rights reserved. He loves to start a piece by settling you onto a cushion of received ideas, then yanking it out from under you. Do yourself a favor and curl up with What the Dog Saw this week: It is more entertaining and edifying than should be legal for any book. How to download eBooks: Next post: The Tipping Point. Previous post: But before I do, here are some specifics, motivated by my will to order the details of his book.
Gladwell describes this amazing pitchman and others of his ilk, contrasting them with actors and ending with the syngergy created when Popeil's methods met live television. Even though the O-rings were viewed as a trouble spot for any space flight, the risk-benefit analysis employed allowed the Challenger to launch, which resulted in tragedy.
The examples of Picasso vs. Cezzanne crystalize his theory, but this essay contains more examples for good measure. It turns out that the two games are vastly different, requiring a different set of skills for success.
He surveys psychologists, human resource directors, job applicants and bosses in an effort to describe the dynamics of the interview. As he did in the title essay about Milan's work with dogs, Gladwell moves his gaze from examining the dog to examining the environment fostered by the dog's owner to ask whether or not banning particular breeds really serves as the best response to the problem of dangerous breeds.
View all 5 comments. Aug 19, Ryan rated it liked it Shelves: Until then? I guess he wins. The book's essays are culled from a decade worth of his writing in The New Yorker. I'm on the fence about Malcolm Gladwell. On one hand, his books are thought-provoking and enjoyable. O "One day, I'll find a lively, out-of-context anecdote that superficially explains why Malcolm Gladwell bugs me. On the other hand, they dabble excessively in storytelling-presented-as-fact. Compared to his books, these page essays further soften Gladwell's soft-science approach by simultaneously making his points less pointed and his subject more broad.
The essays occasionally felt sprawling and fact-free, bundling casual observations into a scientific-seeming hypothesis. With that said, there were a handful of essays here which were truly outstanding. While interesting, I took these essays with a big grain of salt and just enjoyed them for enjoyment's sake.
If you're new to Gladwell, I'd start with one of his books instead. Oct 25, Riku Sayuj rated it it was amazing.
Probably the best Malcolm Gladwell book that I've read, and I've read them all. Sep 20, S. Baqer Al-Meshqab rated it really liked it. This could be my least favorite book for Gladwell. In my opinion, it is usually hard to construct a book that is likeable enough, out of a collection of articles or blogs. I honestly didn't expect too much out of it. However, being my least favorite doesn't make it bad. It is actually good, real good.
For a book that compiles several titles, Galdwell did a good job in explaining each idea and support it with social experiments and Statistics. However there were many which piqued my interest. Panicking and Choking. He states that at time of possible failure, a human could fall into either Thinking too much, or Not Thinking at all. Depending on the situation, panicking or choking could lead to either saving that person, or rushing him to his death.
Another example is the effect of plagiarism should pose on someone life. He tells the story of a psychologist invested in studying serial killers who got her book stolen to every last word and turned into a play. Was this thing too bad? Did it have a good impact on the Society? The fate of all Pitballs were determined because of an accident in which 3 small dogs attacked a child, and the state decided that no one could own a pitball.
Poor dogs. Malcom ensures that the cause incident is more complex that one may think. Banning one species will certainly not gonna solve the problem, and in his book, he shall tell you why. What The Dog Saw is a great attempt in a creating a collection of quite interesting stories which tackles a lot of topics at the heart of Sociology, Economy, and Psychology. View 1 comment. Jan 17, Thomas rated it really liked it Shelves: Not my typical reading fare - you can tell by the dearth of nonfiction on my Goodreads shelf and the time it took me to read this.
What the Dog Saw is divided into three sections: I didn't enjoy Part 1 as much as 2 or 3 because I could not connect with the anecdotes or the characters within each short story. They weren't actual f Not my typical reading fare - you can tell by the dearth of nonfiction on my Goodreads shelf and the time it took me to read this. They weren't actual fiction stories but little narratives of real events that happened - I suppose the fact that I read this portion of the book in a similar way to fiction showcases Malcolm Gladwell's storytelling talent.
Part 2 was where I started to get hooked. Something Borrowed questioned plagiarism and how society perceives it today as opposed to in the past. The Art of Failure began with describing a tennis match and transitioned into the difference between choking and panicking. I loved every story of Part 3 - I read the entire section in a day. Gladwell writes about aspects of contemporary society with a fine felicity. This part of the book made buying it worth the money.
What the Dog Saw is an extraordinary collection of essays that are written with intelligence and precision. The research Malcolm Gladwell must have put into each of these stories amazes me - now I want to reread some of his previously published works.
Want to read more of my writing? Follow me here. Jan 11, Tania Lukinyuk rated it really liked it. I finally-finally finished it! But not because it is boring - it is collection of articles by Gladwell, so it does not go down like one single book.
What the Dog Saw and Other Adventures by Malcolm Gladwell
All articles clearly demonstrate inquisitive mind and quick wit of Gladwell, but not all of them are of equal interest and thrill. Some articles feel like they are concocted out of thin air, some are too plain and unexcited. But I was fascinated by the stories of colorant revolution in the US, value of talent and specifics of human perceptions at jo I finally-finally finished it! But I was fascinated by the stories of colorant revolution in the US, value of talent and specifics of human perceptions at job interviews.
Feb 25, Rebecca rated it it was amazing Shelves: A little background: I really love Malcolm Gladwell. I was first introduced to him through my Persuasion class I took while studying abroad last summer. We had to read Blink, his first published book; it was one of the most interesting books I have ever read for a class. He is no stranger to writing, though. His full-time occupation is as a journalist for the New Yorker.
Why is he so amazing, might you ask? I'll tell you. Malcolm Gladwell has this amazing ability in his writing to find things tha A little background: Malcolm Gladwell has this amazing ability in his writing to find things that are seemingly unrelated ideas and anecdotes, and relate them to each other in radical ways.
What the Dog Saw is different than his previous books, in that it is a compilation of articles he has written for the New Yorker, organized around a cohesive idea: This article talks about the original family of pitchmen like Billy Mays.
Basically the Popeil family is reallyl inventive and can sell people boxes of crap because they're so good at their job Not only are they excellent pitchmen, but they would spend countless hours in the workshop.
One of their inventions, the kitchen rotisserie, had over patents on it alone. Why is it that there are dozens of kinds of mustard but only one kind of ketchup? Well it turns out there are a lot of reasons. For example, did you know that there are five kinds of taste? Sweet, Salty, Sour, Bitter, and Umami. Umami is a more recent discovery, as it's much harder to place than the first four kinds of taste. It comes from protein and amino acids so it's prevelant in foods like chicken noodle soup and seaweed.
Ketchup is a rare food that has all five tastes in one and is all perfectly blended so you're not left with the aftertaste of one over another. A lot of other reasons, too. Who knew ketchup was so fascinating! I'm a little fuzzy on the details of this chapter because it talked about investments and other stuff that my knowledge is sketchy on.
It was still really interesting, though.
Basically it talks about this guy, Nassim Taleb, takes a completely different approach to investments than anybody else. His way is harder for people to accept, because it can lead to losing small amounts of money over a long period of time with no risk of losing big time, rather than the current way which is to take a huge risk that can either pay off big or leave you completely destitute.
The history of hair dye. The story of a beauty product that ended up being deeply connected to women and their changing identities through the fifties and sixties. The way in which they were advertised by two women prominent in the advertising industry mirrored the way women felt about themselves and what dying their hair meant to them and the role they played in society.
One of my favorite pieces, this article talks about the history of birth control. So much info here, about the relevance of Catholicism to the method of the pill, how women's menstraul cycles have changed with modern times and technology, and the medical benefits of birth control being on the pill lowers your risk of ovarian cancer -- crazy! This article is about Millan the Dog Whisperer, how he came to his job, how he works with dogs, and with people, and the body gestures and signals that we process subconsciously that leads to his success.
Enron, the huge scandal of the 90's, was actually not as secretive as firsts accused. Rather, it shows the problem of too much information, rather than not enough. Enron did not hide anything so much as they did not explain how their business worked in a way that was understood by the majority of people including most of the people on their executive board.
Homelessness is actually cheaper to solve by giving them paid-for apartments and individual service than things like homeless shelters and soup kitchens. In general, the majority of homeless people are not homeless for long; it is only a few people that are costing the big bucks, the chronically homeless. Fix them, and you fix the bulk of the problem. Another fascinating article for women.
In overview, reading and interpreting mammograms correctly is a much sketchier process than we might realize.
See a Problem?
He relates it, quite well, to the problem the military has with correclty interpreting infrared pictures of possible terrorist targets. Should plagiarism in writing be that big of a deal?
He has a personal anecdote here of a woman who wrote a play that became very famous, but was quickly pulled after she was accused by a woman of having her life story blatantly used as the plot of the main character, based off an article that Malcolm Gladwell had written about her. While the woman had a legitimate complaint, Gladwell muses about the morality of plagiarism, and the idea that all art and creativity is based off something else, which makes a very fine line.
The previous chapter on Enron touches on the fact of too much information can be worse than too little, and that same argument is made here. American intelligence agencies had so much information, so many "tips", that it became very difficult to separate the fact from the fiction.
It's not about having the information, but being able to connect the dots between what is already there. What is the difference between "choking" and "panicking"? Turns out, quite a lot. Both create separate physical reactions and come from different places.
Here Gladwell goes into the plane crash of the Kennedy son, what he was experiencing at the time, and why it happened. Human nature wants to say that something can definitely be fixed, or somebody was definitely to blame, for an accident of that magnitude. But in reality, it wasn't one big blunder as much as a lot of little calculations, that individually are not considered critical, but all culminated at once to produce a disaster; and really, there's no way to prevent against that. Why is it that we only call people "geniuses" if they come to fruition when they're young?
Aren't old geniuses possible? Turns out, we have another term for them, "masters", and the approach of the two are completely different, but equally interesting. How do you hire someone if you don't know who qualifies for the job? Gladwell uses two examples here, quarterbacks who transition from college to pro, and financial advisors, to culminate into the idea that the system for hiring public school teachers is in need of a drastic reformation. All three of these areas are jobs where it is impossible to tell who is good at it until they are actually immersed in the program.
Criminal profiling, at it's surface, seems an amazing ability of psychologists to get at the heart of a person based of superficial facts of a crime scene. However, it may be more of a hoax than originally thought, and not really that helpful in catching the bad guy.
Are smart people overrated? Enron comes into play again, as they had a different outlook on how people were promoted and rewarded in their company. If you were smart, if you had "talent", you got what you wanted and were given enormous responsibility, whether or not you were really qualified for the task. If you think about it, hiring somebody based off a piece of paper and spending at most an hour with them in an interview seems extremely superficial and basic.
So why is it that we make such a big decision based off that? Again, more subconscious work at play here. One of the saddest articles, I think. Pit bulls are unfairly stereotyped in several countries, and in many states in the U. Banned as viscious and human aggressive dogs, the truth points more toward the owners of the dogs and the lifestyle the dog is brought up in. Each of the articles first appeared in The New Yorker and was handpicked by Gladwell to show us the world through the eyes of various people and even a dog.
The book is divided in 3 parts: Jul 24, Cortney rated it really liked it. I know, I know. Malcolm Gladwell brings out extremes in readers.
In one camp, you have rabid fans who think he is a transcendent genius, who will change previously held beliefs on the strength of one carefully crafted and engaging TED talk. On the other, you have cynics who sneer at the lemmings who behave as I previously described and dismiss him as a pop psychologist.
Ok, perhaps that was even more extreme in my description, but the point is I'm in the middle. If one thinks of him as a philoso I know, I know.
If one thinks of him as a philosopher type writer, who surveys the cultural landscape and synthesizes media into strangely compelling and interesting books and articles, I think it's far easier to just enjoy him, without having to laugh in one's sleeve at an over simplification, or get all starry eyed at an idea he is presenting.
I really enjoyed this book, even though at times it seems he goes out of his way to pick the most disparate topics, compare them, and then make some far fetched and often counter intuitive conclusion- my partner and I joked that he is so contrary, one often just has to think of the commonly held idea around a subject, think of the total opposite, and one can safely bet Gladwell will set up camp around the latter.
But again, if one takes him as a pondering philosopher, instead of a last word, infallible source, he is a great resource for sparking new thoughts on old ideas, and for re-examining long held beliefs. My favorite chapters were on homelessness in Denver, and plagiarism.
I like that Gladwell seems to be a big, curious kid, willing to do research on random topics and hang out with weird a compliment people and write from a different point of view. Dec 06, Loy Machedo rated it liked it. After being rejected by more than a dozen advertising agencies, Malcolm Gladwell went from obscurity to literary reverence.
I mean the guy can write. Not just write but write about stuff we take so for granted and wish we had asked the same questions he asks.
I mean the guy is great in his observations but then again you would ask yourself, do you really want to know all what he has spend time researching on or is it better to just know a few bits and forget the rest? I think that is a question you would have to ask yourself. So what do we have in this brilliant bible of articles?
Here are a few thoughts.. Have you ever wondered why there is only one kind of ketchup but so many kinds of mustards? What made the Veg-O-Matic so successful and why?
The book is filled with all these brilliant findings that make you think and at times give you an awful headache as to how much there is to know. The only criticism Malcolm Gladwell can face is being categorized as an eccentric essayist and a dilettante who postulates inconspicuous statistical data spiced up with misleading definitions and magnifies it to sound very credible and convincing yet banal, boring and bluntly ineffective.
I would only tell those critics — Shut up dude. But I did understand what Malcolm is trying to say though deep down I still wonder if I did… All in all, brilliant read and a worth while addition to your collection of books though many a times, it can be boring having stacked up with excessive information which you may not want to know about. Overall rating — 6 out of This review and others can be found on BW Book Reviews. A very average book that had many interesting stories or adventures as Gladwell called them but not many that stood out.
I can think of four stories, technically three topics, that really stood out to me. The first was one that dealt with plagiarism. Gladwell took a story — a woman who saw that a play had plagiarized her life — and reacted as most would: She sued. Yet, Gladwell spent so much time making us sympathize with the woman whose life was plagiarized, then took a chance to completely spin the story in a new way.
He tried to make us see how the plagiarizer felt. And he succeeded in it. He grasped the way the woman felt, along with arguments against this being plagiarized. Profiling is the next two articles he wrote about that impressed me. Obviously, Gladwell has an issue with profiling, but the arguments were very different. It was interesting since I love Criminal Minds and I used to want to do that work.
I wanted to be a profiler. I wanted to do that so desperately. What I liked that Gladwell did was examining profiling as if it was a psychic doing their work, along with pointing out all the ways it was that.
The second article he wrote against profiling was to do with pitbulls. I mean, how interesting. He talked about the reasons why banning pitbulls are wrong, along with offering a way to change it to make it better. Rather than caring about stable things i. And, lastly, the final story I enjoyed was the titular one. What the Dog Saw. What I liked was how it tied his work with dogs into his life and how he had to develop as a person, much how the dogs he worked with had to develop into dogs.
I grew up watching his TV show because my mom loved it. We even use some of his techniques in our house. Those were my four favorite stories boiled down into quick summaries. There were quite a few stories, though, and not all of them I liked. Nov 18, Carmen rated it liked it Recommends it for: Curious people. This is a series of essays, non-fiction.
They were very smart and interesting. The Pitchman is a about a salesman. The Ketchup Conundrum is about how tastes are developed and how people deal with challenges to that developed taste.
What the Dog Saw and Other Adventures
Blowing Up is about investment strategy, it's kind of boring. True Colors. This is about hair dye and advertising. I liked it. John Rock's Error. This was about birth control. He raises some interesting points, but I don't know if I agree with all This is a series of essays, non-fiction. He raises some interesting points, but I don't know if I agree with all of them. An article about Cesar Millan, the dog trainer. I really liked this article, even though it was less about training dogs and more about whether Millan knows some secret body-language.
Open Secrets. An article about Entron. Million-Dollar Murray. An article about homelessness. The Picture Problem. About the limits of pictures, as tied to mammograms and satellite. Very interesting, and he brings up some good points about pictures. Something Borrowed. An article about plagiarism. He makes some very good and interesting points. Connecting the Dots. An article about national intelligence.
He makes very good points. The Art of Failure. An article about the differences between choking and panicking. Very interesting. Late Bloomers. An interesting article on people who come into their talent later in life, and about sponsorship.
Most Likely to Succeed. An interesting article about talent. Dangerous Minds. An interesting article about profiling. The Talent Myth. How should companies be structured and operate? The New-Boy Network. An article about job interviews, judgment and first impressions.
An article about pit bulls. Are they dangerous, or is it their owners?
Making assumptions about NYC being violent. Racial profiling. Sep 11, Robert rated it it was amazing Shelves: I didn't buy this book because it is a collection of already published articles, nearly all of which I have read already.
But I saw it at the library and decided to read it anyway. What a wonderfully fun experience. There are quite a few criticism I could make of these articles. Gladwell is a storyteller and sometimes lets telling a good story take precedence over reality. In his case, this usually means making all of the pieces fit together just so, instead of revealing the messy way that the w I didn't buy this book because it is a collection of already published articles, nearly all of which I have read already.
In his case, this usually means making all of the pieces fit together just so, instead of revealing the messy way that the world doesn't always fit together right. I could go on, but the fact is: I really like reading these articles. Some of them are as fun and as fine as great short stories. And sometimes those pieces really do fit together exactly the way he implies.
I loved the opening piece on Ron Popeil, of Ronco informercial fame.
An inventor and a pitchman; I enjoyed seeing his familiar patter through Gladwell's eyes. Likewise Cesar Milan and his dogs. His essay on culture and hair coloring products puts together a story that puts to shame all of those people trying to view the culture through one lens or another I could go on about plagiarism, homelessness and pollution , cancer detection and terrorism and so on But that's enough for me to remember why I liked this book so much.
View 2 comments. A collection of essays previously published in The New Yorker, with publication dates ranging from to Gladwell is at his pop science best here, taking on Enron, corporate hiring practices, pitbulls, homelessness, Cesar Millan, plagiarism, and the hair color industry.
He even manages to make stock options transparent for a while. As always, his writing is deft, easy, and accessible. I particularly enjoyed the piece on the Morris-Popeil of the Ron Popeil Popeils Dynasty, the essay on ketchup and why it's no mustard this made me crave French fries so desperately I nearly threw the book down and took off for McDonald's mid-essay , and the articles on military intelligence and mammograms. The essay on birth control was one of the first things I'd ever read by Gladwell and it impressed me a lot at the time.
Today it raised more questions than praise. The essay, written in , says the Pill was wrongly accused of causing blood clots in the late s. Oral contraceptives cause blood clots now , but they also have a vastly different hormonal profile than the original Pill. A brief Google of the internet has nothing to say on the subject, so I can't back myself up here, but something's off.
Gladwell adds footnotes to update several articles, but the blood clot issue -- as well as new findings connecting artificial hormones and cancer in female bodies -- goes unaddressed.
Several of these pieces felt too short; I'd turn the page and be surprised it was over, and if you've read Blink you're already familiar with the concept, and much of the research, behind "The New-Boy Network," but if you like Gladwell, you'll like this book.
Four stars. Gladwell has a real gift for setting a scene and getting across a lot of information in a way that doesn't make it feel like someone dumped an encyclopedia on your head. This epub has a footnote to nowhere! Actually, it links to a different, unrelated footnote, but that was weird. A bigger problem is that almost every acronym in this book is rendered in italics for no good reason.
And it's not consistent; if the acronym is near certain punctuation marks, it's not in italics. Obviously the formatting got borked somewhere. Trevor McCandless. I hadn't realized this was a collection of Gladwell's essays, many most?
And just for the sake of completeness, the New York Times published a "profile" of Gladwell, back in , entitled The Gladwell Effect , by Rachel Donadio, which includes two pictures showing Gladwell's exuberant hair at two degrees of shornness. Although not quite as luxurious as Pinker's tresses View all 11 comments.
Leftover scraps This book felt like a forced dish of leftovers from other books or articles. It lacked a clear central theme to derive a clear lesson unlike other books in Gladwell's collection like Tipping Point Small things builds critical mass and changes norm , Blink Small samples can help make valuable decisions , Outliers 10, hours of practice to achieve greatness.
This book was just a mish-mash of stories, some good, some so so, but mostly unrelated or at least I was to MMmmm This book was just a mish-mash of stories, some good, some so so, but mostly unrelated or at least I was too dumb to get the central theme.
Gladwell's story telling capabilities were intact so it was still somewhat entertaining but the lack of a central theme made me feel it it was running all over the place with it's head cut off. He goes from understanding a kitchen gadget inventor to why there's more flavors of mustard than ketchup to investment philosophies of hedge funds to pit bull bans Me too!! This one is definitely not Gladwell's best work but it's not horrendous So put it off until you've run out of other books Jun 05, Pradnya K.
While reading this book I was wondering all the way - how nice it would be to open a magazine and find such intriguing, well-researched, knowledgeable post with a morning tea!
Yes, these are the posts from The New Yorker where he has been working. Such fine posts are rarity these days. I like non fiction. Especially when they're told in intriguing way like this. It's fun to read and many times I found myself waiting for what's next? This is hard to achieve when it comes to research and real life While reading this book I was wondering all the way - how nice it would be to open a magazine and find such intriguing, well-researched, knowledgeable post with a morning tea!
This is hard to achieve when it comes to research and real life write ups. It's a balanced mixture of psychology, behavior, history, research, religion and morals, and science. As Gladwell points out, this is not a book about the legends but the middle ones who have made impact on generations.
So, naturally it brings the less known things to the light. Ironically these are also about the commonplace things like, tomato ketchup, vegetable slicer, hair dye, a dog trainer, mustard or birth control pills.
The book has it all with their very little known history. It succeeds or fails on the strength of its ability to engage you, to make you think, to give you a glimpse into someone else's head - even if in the end you conclude that someone else's head is not a place you're really like to be. Reading about dog psychology, I realized why dogs react to few people in angrier ways than to others.
Reading the history of hair dyes and their ad-campaigns, one gets a different angle to see the old time conceptions of how women were perceived if they dyed their hair. Similarly, the criminal psychology is interesting just like any real suspense thriller. It also throws a light on the problem of homelessness and how it is easier to end it than to manage it.
At the same time how unjustified it will be to provide home to the drug addicts, living on the streets than helping poor, honest people who take efforts to earn their livelihood.
He not only puts his point but makes you see the irony of our system and the inevitable, unanswered questions. May it be the cancer screening tests or a banning pit bulls.